Current:Home > InvestAmazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa -InfiniteWealth
Amazon must pay over $30 million over claims it invaded privacy with Ring and Alexa
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:22:01
Amazon will pay more than $30 million in fines to settle alleged privacy violations involving its voice assistant Alexa and doorbell camera Ring, according to federal filings.
In one lawsuit, the Federal Trade Commission claims the tech company violated privacy laws by keeping recordings of children's conversations with its voice assistant Alexa, and in another that its employees have monitored customers' Ring camera recordings without their consent.
The FTC alleges Amazon held onto children's voice and geolocation data indefinitely, illegally used it to improve its algorithm and kept transcripts of their interactions with Alexa despite parents' requests to delete them.
The alleged practices would violate the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act, or COPPA, which requires online companies to alert and obtain consent from parents when they gather data for children under age 13 and allow parents to delete the data at will.
In addition to the $25 million civil penalty, Amazon would not be able to use data that has been requested to be deleted. The company also would have to remove children's inactive Alexa accounts and be required to notify its customers about the FTC's actions against the company.
"Amazon's history of misleading parents, keeping children's recordings indefinitely, and flouting parents' deletion requests violated COPPA and sacrificed privacy for profits," said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, in a statement. "COPPA does not allow companies to keep children's data forever for any reason, and certainly not to train their algorithms."
Until September 2019, Alexa's default settings were to store recordings and transcripts indefinitely. Amazon said it uses the recordings to better understand speech patterns and respond to voice commands, the complaint says.
After the FTC intervened at the time, Amazon added a setting to automatically delete data after three or 18 months, but still kept the indefinite setting as the default.
Amazon said in a statement it disagrees with the FTC's findings and does not believe it violated any laws.
"We take our responsibilities to our customers and their families very seriously," it said. "We have consistently taken steps to protect customer privacy by providing clear privacy disclosures and customer controls, conducting ongoing audits and process improvements, and maintaining strict internal controls to protect customer data."
The company said it requires parental consent for all children's profiles, provides a Children's Privacy Disclosure elaborating on how it uses children's data, allows child recordings and transcripts to be deleted in the Alexa app and erases child profiles that have been inactive for at least 18 months.
More than 800,000 children under age 13 have their own Alexa accounts, according to the complaint.
The FTC claims that when these issues were brought to Amazon's attention, it did not take action to remedy them.
In a separate lawsuit, the FTC seeks a $5.8 million fine for Amazon over claims employees and contractors at Ring — a home surveillance company Amazon bought in 2018 — had full access to customers' videos.
Amazon is also accused of not taking its security protections seriously, as hackers were able to break into two-way video streams to sexually proposition people, call children racial slurs and physically threaten families for ransom.
Despite this, the FTC says, Ring did not implement multi-factor authentication until 2019.
In addition to paying the $5.8 million, which will be issued as customer refunds, Ring would have to delete customers' videos and faces from before 2018, notify customers about the FTC's actions and report any unauthorized access to videos to the FTC.
"Ring's disregard for privacy and security exposed consumers to spying and harassment," Levine said. "The FTC's order makes clear that putting profit over privacy doesn't pay."
The proposed orders require approval from federal judges.
veryGood! (39169)
Related
- Small twin
- Beyoncé tour sales are off to a smoother start. What does that mean for Ticketmaster?
- EPA to Probe Whether North Carolina’s Permitting of Biogas From Swine Feeding Operations Violates Civil Rights of Nearby Neighborhoods
- These combat vets want to help you design the perfect engagement ring
- New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
- Groundhog Day 2023
- The Chess Game Continues: Exxon, Under Pressure, Says it Will Take More Steps to Cut Emissions. Investors Are Not Impressed
- Despite billions to get off coal, why is Indonesia still building new coal plants?
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- The return of Chinese tourism?
Ranking
- Senate begins final push to expand Social Security benefits for millions of people
- 3 fairly mummified bodies found at remote Rocky Mountains campsite in Colorado, authorities say
- Peter Thomas Roth 50% Off Deal: Clear Up Acne and Reduce Fine Lines With Complexion Correction Pads
- Amazon reports its first unprofitable year since 2014
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- A man accused of torturing women is using dating apps to look for victims, police say
- Wildfire Smoke: An Emerging Threat to West Coast Wines
- Google shares drop $100 billion after its new AI chatbot makes a mistake
Recommendation
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
A silent hazard is sinking buildings in Chicago and other major cities – and it will only get worse
Powerball jackpot climbs to $875 million after no winners in Wednesday's drawing
A Personal Recession Toolkit
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Increased Flooding and Droughts Linked to Climate Change Have Sent Crop Insurance Payouts Skyrocketing
This Jennifer Aniston Editing Error From a 2003 Friends Episode Will Have You Doing a Double Take
Whitney Cummings Is Pregnant, Expecting First Baby