Current:Home > FinanceNo fooling: FanDuel fined for taking bets on April Fool’s Day on events that happened a week before -InfiniteWealth
No fooling: FanDuel fined for taking bets on April Fool’s Day on events that happened a week before
View
Date:2025-04-16 01:50:09
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) — It might have seemed too good to be true, but there it was, and on April Fool’s Day, no less: One of the country’s leading sports books was taking bets on mixed martial arts fights that had already happened a week earlier.
FanDuel accepted 34 bets on the fights that were promoted by the sports book as live events scheduled to take place on April 1, 2022.
But the fights had actually taken place a week earlier, on March 25.
New Jersey gambling regulators fined FanDuel $2,000 for the mistake, and the company paid out over $230,000 to settle the bets.
FanDuel declined comment Wednesday on the fine, which it agreed to pay.
But the state Division of Gaming Enforcement said in a letter made public on Monday that FanDuel said it was not notified by its data-feed providers that the Professional Fighters League matches were actually a recording of events that had already happened.
Instead, FanDuel’s trading team manually created betting markets based on information they obtained directly from the Professional Fighters League, New Jersey Deputy Attorney General Gina DeAnnuntis wrote.
“FanDuel confirmed that its traders failed to confirm with PFL that the event had previously occurred and was being presented via a tape delay,” she wrote.
FanDuel told the state that on April 1, 2022, it took 26 online wagers and eight retail wagers worth $190,904 on the events.
Afterwards, FanDuel received a notification from the International Betting Integrity Association, which monitors sports betting transactions, looking for suspicious activity or out-of-the-ordinary patterns, that the events it was offering odds on had already happened.
FanDuel paid off the wagers in the amount of $231,094, according to the state.
The fine from New Jersey regulators was imposed on Jan. 2 but not made public until this week. The state also required FanDuel to update its internal controls to prevent such events from happening in the future.
It was not the first time a sports book operating in New Jersey mistakenly took bets on something that had already happened.
In 2021, 86 gamblers put down bets on a British soccer game that had already happened the day before. The bets were voided, and New Jersey regulators fined the Malta-based sports betting technology company Kambi Group and Chicago-based Rush Street Interactive $1,000 apiece. In that case, the companies had offered a so-called proposition or “prop” bet on whether Manchester United’s Marcus Rashford would score a goal in a May 13, 2021, soccer game between Manchester United and Liverpool. (He did.)
But because a Kambi trader located in England mistakenly entered a start date of May 14 for the game, it enabled people to place bets on the event after it had ended when it was known that Rashford had already scored.
Last week, New Jersey regulators revealed that they had fined DraftKings, another major national sports book, $100,000 for reporting inaccurate sports betting data to the state.
___
Follow Wayne Parry on X at www.twitter.com/WayneParryAC
veryGood! (3155)
Related
- Man can't find second winning lottery ticket, sues over $394 million jackpot, lawsuit says
- Horoscopes Today, March 7, 2024
- Rust weapons supervisor Hannah Gutierrez-Reed convicted of involuntary manslaughter in accidental shooting
- See Who Is Attending the Love Is Blind Season Six Reunion
- What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
- Automaker Rivian pauses construction of its $5 billion electric truck plant in Georgia
- Democrats walk out of Kentucky hearing on legislation dealing with support for nonviable pregnancies
- This 'Euphoria' star says she's struggled with bills after Season 3 delays. Here's why.
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- 'Survivor' season 46: Who was voted off and why was there a Taylor Swift, Metallica battle
Ranking
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Paul Simon to receive PEN America’s Literary Service Award
- 2024 outfield rankings: Ronald Acuña isn't the only one with elite all-around skills
- Explosions, controlled burn in East Palestine train derailment were unnecessary, NTSB official head says
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Bill that could make TikTok unavailable in the US advances quickly in the House
- South Dakota Legislature ends session but draws division over upcoming abortion rights initiative
- The Metropolitan Opera Orchestra will tour Asia for the first time in June
Recommendation
Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
Katy Perry's Backside-Baring Red Carpet Look Will Leave You Wide Awake
Britt Reid is enjoying early prison release: Remember what he did, not just his privilege
Automaker Rivian pauses construction of its $5 billion electric truck plant in Georgia
Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
BBC Scotland's Nick Sheridan Dead at 32
Platform Mini Boots Are Your Perfect Shoe for In-Between Weather: From UGG to $27 Finds
Trump ordered to pay legal fees after failed lawsuit over ‘shocking and scandalous’ Steele dossier