Current:Home > reviewsArkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure -InfiniteWealth
Arkansas Supreme Court upholds rejection of abortion rights petitions, blocking ballot measure
View
Date:2025-04-26 10:11:10
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) — The Arkansas Supreme Court upheld the state’s rejection of signature petitions for an abortion rights ballot initiative on Thursday, keeping the proposal from going before voters in November.
The ruling dashed the hopes of organizers, who submitted the petitions, of getting the constitutional amendment measure on the ballot in the predominantly Republican state, where many top leaders tout their opposition to abortion.
Election officials said Arkansans for Limited Government, the group behind the measure, did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired. The group disputed that assertion and argued it should have been given more time to provide any additional documents needed.
“We find that the Secretary correctly refused to count the signatures collected by paid canvassers because the sponsor failed to file the paid canvasser training certification,” the court said in a 4-3 ruling.
Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision removing the nationwide right to abortion, there has been a push to have voters decide the matter state by state.
Arkansas currently bans abortion at any time during a pregnancy, unless the woman’s life is endangered due to a medical emergency.
The proposed amendment would have prohibited laws banning abortion in the first 20 weeks of gestation and allowed the procedure later on in cases of rape, incest, threats to the woman’s health or life, or if the fetus would be unlikely to survive birth. It would not have created a constitutional right to abortion.
The ballot proposal lacked support from national abortion rights groups such as Planned Parenthood because it would still have allowed abortion to be banned after 20 weeks, which is earlier than other states where it remains legal.
Had they all been verified, the more than 101,000 signatures, submitted on the state’s July 5 deadline, would have been enough to qualify for the ballot. The threshold was 90,704 signatures from registered voters, and from a minimum of 50 counties.
In a earlier filing with the court, election officials said that 87,675 of the signatures submitted were collected by volunteers with the campaign. Election officials said it could not determine whether 912 of the signatures came from volunteer or paid canvassers.
Arkansans for Limited Government and election officials disagreed over whether the petitions complied with a 2013 state law requiring campaigns to submit statements identifying each paid canvasser by name and confirming that rules for gathering signatures were explained to them.
Supporters of the measure said they followed the law with their documentation, including affidavits identifying each paid gatherer. They have also argued the abortion petitions are being handled differently than other initiative campaigns this year, pointing to similar filings by two other groups.
State records show that the abortion campaign did submit, on June 27, a signed affidavit including a list of paid canvassers and a statement saying the petition rules had been explained to them. Moreover, the July 5 submission included affidavits from each paid worker acknowledging that the group provided them with all the rules and regulations required by law.
The state argued in court that this documentation did not comply because it was not signed by someone with the canvassing company rather than the initiative campaign itself. The state said the statement also needed to be submitted alongside the petitions.
veryGood! (57)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Olaplex, Sunday Riley & More: Stock Up on These Under $50 Beauty Deals Today Only
- COP26 Presented Forests as a Climate Solution, But May Not Be Able to Keep Them Standing
- CEO predictions, rural voters on the economy and IRS audits
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- Why the Poor in Baltimore Face Such Crushing ‘Energy Burdens’
- See Chris Evans, Justin Bieber and More Celeb Dog Dads With Their Adorable Pups
- To Understand How Warming is Driving Harmful Algal Blooms, Look to Regional Patterns, Not Global Trends
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Check Out the Most Surprising Celeb Transformations of the Week
Ranking
- Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
- Tori Spelling and Dean McDermott Break Up After 17 Years of Marriage
- Kate Spade's Massive Extra 40% Off Sale Has a $248 Tote Bag for $82 & More Amazing Deals
- Let Your Reflection Show You These 17 Secrets About Mulan
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- Tesla slashes prices across all its models in a bid to boost sales
- And Just Like That Costume Designer Molly Rogers Teases More Details on Kim Cattrall's Cameo
- A woman is ordered to repay $2,000 after her employer used software to track her time
Recommendation
Friday the 13th luck? 13 past Mega Millions jackpot wins in December. See top 10 lottery prizes
Exxon Turns to Academia to Try to Discredit Harvard Research
Ice Dam Bursts Threaten to Increase Sunny Day Floods as Hotter Temperatures Melt Glaciers
Thinx settled a lawsuit over chemicals in its period underwear. Here's what to know
This was the average Social Security benefit in 2004, and here's what it is now
Inside Clean Energy: Unpacking California’s Controversial New Rooftop Solar Proposal
Eminent Domain Lets Pipeline Developers Take Land, Pay Little, Say Black Property Owners
Supreme Court’s Unusual Decision to Hear a Coal Case Could Deal President Biden’s Climate Plans Another Setback